Abstract
The subject of leadership may lead to refer to the importance in several views. The leadership viewpoint is different from that of employee, and he may differ from other employees. Accordingly, the stands and trends are furthermore different in expressing votes here and there. Some considerations are supposed to be taken into account by the employee himself when employees’ leadership can be directed towards the specified targets. The intellectual dilemma of the research is limited by the main factors that constitute the employee vote? Reference to non supposition of priorities, relative importance of vote is hypothesized to have not been taken in the sequence of cooperation and participation in the leadership. Factor analysis and Pareto Chat were taken in the study, the research has concluded to methodological in the leadership behavior that the employee sees necessary in leadership as well as decreasing such factors, and the sensationalism that can constitute the main ethical use of the leadership use almost in the employee’s vote.
